Chevrolet Colorado & GMC Canyon Forum banner

5.3 with Supercharger

27K views 14 replies 8 participants last post by  Slo86GT  
#1 ·
#3 ·
Why bother with the TVS1900? Why not go with the TVS2300?
 
#4 · (Edited)
So I did the numbers figuring a 15% drivetrain loss!

STOCK Flywheel
300 HP
320 TQ

TVS1900
435.39 HP Flywheel
424.8 TQ Flywheel

So an improvement of 135hp and 104ftlb with the tune, not to shabby!

$5950/135HP = $44.07 per 1 HP

Price per power ratio is pretty damn good!
 
#13 ·
First of all this is pretty fricken sweet! Glad someone has done it. I've thought about selling my truck to do the same, now that there is a kit it is even more tempting...the problem is I like the xtreme body kit too much and since I already have a high performance toy I don't really need a high performance daily. Not counting the loss I'd take to get there...

Second, why do I get ragged on so much for the cost of my system when I got a better $/HP than this?!

Same assumptions and math:
3.5L Stock
220HP Flywheel

S/C 3.5L (W2W - <$6000 installed)
306 WHP = 360 Flywheel

$6000/140HP = $42.86 per 1 HP

That's not pointed at you specifically 1BADI5. Thanks for sharing this.
 
#8 ·
You can get the 2300 for the GMT900s :shrug: It all comes down to tuning in the end!
 
#6 ·
i think alot more is in it, if it had a smaller pulley to up the boost. that dyno was at 6psi
 
#9 ·
getting it and it being the right application are 2 diff things..


I can put a 90mm turbo on the colorado but it wouldnt be worth shit :lol:

the right charger for the right application is whats its about...








... im also talking out of my ass cause im bored I have no idea lol
 
#15 ·
10 minutes after trying to post, my post didn't show up, even when browsing through the site further. I close down for the night, open it back up and look. I made 10 posts that weren't there last night.

Whoever is hosting this site has some fuuuuuucked up db update caching software.